Love and Hip Hop series 2 show/episode 3: Chrissy gets her sight on Yandi and keeps on sneaking tattling back to Jim

OMG! This is complusive viewing. I'm a Love and Hip Hop addict. Truth, I'am like a drug fiend when it comes to watching this. I'm so hook but I digress. My current favourite are Chrissy Lampkins and Kimbella for different reasons. Also Samaya.

Show two wasn't really much but show 3 is the one to see.

Chrissy Lampkin and Yandi

So we tale off from when Somaya fly zip was leave on done at her showcase and Chrissy Lampkin starts another fight with Yandi who is Jim Jones manager.  They are both wrong and right. In fact I love Chrissy but I'm the whole Kimbella fight (and the girl was naked - no panties which was why it was pixellated by the good people at VH1) had made me wary of her. I like her but the fight another chick like a drunken man is another thing. Anyway I dirgress.

Yandi starts mouthing off about cheques then she starts to dance the Mama Jone's single which is just a red flag to Chrissy. She comes out charging verbally this time like a bull in a chinashop or maybe like bullets from a gansta's gun in a shoot out.

So Chrissy Lampkin is angry at what Yandi and rightly so because she is loyal to her man. Also because she feels Yandi is disrespecting her man Jim Jones by putting him in the same catergory as Somaya and Kimbella. It's when Yandi says in a sort of way she will manage anyone that brings her cheques.   So it's like she is comparing Somaya and Kimbella to Jim Jones. She is also like saying it's about the money. Also dancing to Nancy Jone's tune did not help.

I think Yandi crosses the line at time with her business relationships and gets emotional.  But you see at Yandi is just a blabber - gift of the gab and good at hustling. If she was a pro there will be no way she will be hanging out with her client's girl friend. Also gettting over familiar in giving her that silly book. However she is a hustler's hustler. As in Jim Jones is on a hustle and Yandi hustles on his behalf.

I like Chrissy as I said above but apart from the fighting what I find unappealing and this may be the way she is protrayed is that after doing things on camera she reports back to Jim Jones like a tattle tale or telling tales then he is forced to get involved. That will be okay but Chrissy Lampkin is not a weak woman - she gives as good as she gets then runs home to boyfriend Jimmy and tells him she has being disrespected or upset.

This may not be the case but it's the second time when conversations off camera have happened. The first was with Somaya's former manager Maurice and second time was with Jim Jones alledgelly cussing out Yandi off camera about Chrissy.  Anyway Yandi teaches him a lesson and he loses $25,000. Yes $25 grand event so Ouch!


It will be interesting to see how this plays off because it seem Yandi no longer manages Jim Jone and Chrissy Lamkins is cited as the cause though I doubt it there is always more.

Chrissy is loyal, out spoken but she needs to either stop VH1 editing her like a tattlle tale or sneak or try and change. Otherwise it makes her look very troublesome and makes Jimmy Jones appears pu$$y-whipped if he is always waging into her battles.

Olivia.

Olivia forgets by the virtue of appearing on Love and Hip Hop she is on the same level as Samaya. It's simple if she were better she would be on a better show. Get over the ego and start afresh. Your behavour is only making Samaya look better. She may not be as good as you are but she is trying!

Samaya
What can I say the world loves a tryer. Good luck!

Emily Bustamaine.

Not sure about Emily Bustamaine. Always crying about Fab and her family. Yet her breasts are hanging out and she wears short mini skirts. She sort of dresses like Kimbella but only with a inch extra for modesty. They are really the same type of girl. I love it when her friend tells her 'There are other atheles or rappers'. Like no ordinary men good enough? Must he be a baller. We all know she is back with Fabulous now anyway.

Anyway she is very passive agressive and it's what she told Kimbella at the launch of her bootie cover of Black men's magazine. 'You must have slept with all the black men here including mine (Fab)'. Ouch! That's worst than the beating Chrissy Lampkin gave Kimbella.All I know is that she has two kids and one is about 12 so I hope she is not as stupid as she is acting. I hope that is all for the cameras and she does have some kind of plan.

It would be nice to see  Emily Bustamaine cover up without everything hanging out. She is not as tarty as Kimbella but she is the closest to it on the show in terms of clothes.


Kimbella.

I do like her and I'm not sure what all this rubbish does for her innerself. It's unhealthy to have people treat a person that way. First it was Chrissy Lampkin beating her up. To be fair if someone had done that to Chrissy Lampkin I wonder what Jimmy Jones would have done. You just a word to Chrissy Lampkin and it's DRAMA! So not too sure what Juelz Santana said to Jim Jones about it. Let put this way. If Chrissy Lampkin and Jim Jones every split up with time that will be it. If Kimbella and Juelz Santana split up there is a child involved.

I digress. Kimbella is a glamour model - no big deal. Maryln Monroe was on and so was Pamela Anderson and also if the price is right for playboy a lot of actresses do it.  She is what she is. She thinks women are jealous of her because she is pretty - not really. She dresses like a tart to get attention thinking she is pretty but attracts the wrong sort of attention.

Like her or not she is trying to make her way. Hopefully she get something out all this because right now she is being picked on by Chrissy Lampkin and sort of made out to be the bad person but in my opinion she has a sweeter naturer than any of time including Emily.

Love and Hip Hop: Chrissy's Lampkin's Weave in Kimbella fight

Wow! I don't need to go to Walmart for some Weave I shall help myself to some of Jim Jone's Bitch.What is good for Mole Face Lampkin Chrissy must be good for me.

Dyam! Is money that tight that you want your weave back, bitch! Come and get it!

All this over some hair? It aint even real!

Waste not want not. I could use this as extra in some styling!

I better put it away before they come back. Synthetic or not a  weave is a weave!

Love and Hip Hop: Nancy Jones aka Mama Jones Diss track

The loving track to Chrissy Lampkin. Guess Chrissy Lampkin better sort out jim Jones's mama and not Kimbella!

Love and Hip Hop: Kimbella and Chrissy setting scores hood style with video!!

Slap! Punch! Kick and Spit! Panties and weave flying! Two hoes get down and dirty. It can only be ....

O.M.G! Lowe and Hip Hop!!!!!!

Let me just say that  Chrissy Lampkin ought to know at 42 years of age  this was set up producers for drama.  Yes, Chrissy Lampkin is 42 years old!!

She didn't beat up Kimbella Vanderhee - she assaulted her. Lucky for her the girl didn't press charges. And Kimbella, you should be treated and disrespected like that regardless. It's not right. It's entertainment. You don't get paid enough for that.

 Kimbella was hit, punched and kicked by Chrissy in the first show of the second season. Everyone said that it was because Chrissy was protecting Emily but watching the show it's was really because Chrissy Lampkin can't stand girls like Kimbella.

From the first time of meeting her with her butt cheeks hanging out of some hot pants at Yandi's party she took an instant dislike to the woman. Even to the point of criticizing the way Kimbella spoke.

There is some about Chrissy Lampkin's character that does not let things go. It happened with Somaya's manager where he applogised to her off camera but she still had to go for it. It happened at the last reunion show where she couldn't just leave a topic alone even thought she had won. She had to have the last word. And it happened again in the first show where she couldn't let Emily and Kimbella deal with it.

Emily was talking and so was Kimbella but Chrissy Lampkin had to keep on going on. It wasn't about supporting Emily Bustamane it was more about the girls that Jim Jones and his boys party with. She lashed out at Kimbella because of what she represented to her. A women who went with rappers while they were in relationships. She lashed out at her deepest fear. The only problem is that all in all though Kimbella Vanderhee got a beating and pulled out a few weave tracks from Chrissy's head - Chrissy lost the most. She revealed her lack of self control that she could just lash out and hit a stranger. Even while the cameras were rollings. Can you imagine how she is in private. She just sees red and goes for it. It wasn't about her but it was really because her man is also a rapper and she dislikes these booty models. I guess we can see there is more to Chrissy that meets the air. Can Jim Jones carry her any where without her going crazy and beating up people? There is more to the Lampkin-Jones relationship that meets the eye.

In the end Kimbella Vanderhee wants to break out of her mode. She wants something different and thinks this will give her a shot. Good luck Kim.

Kim Kardashian - Marriage Victim or Wedding Sinner?

Give the woman a break!

Kim Kardashian did not cause the Euro crisis, she not responsible for high unemployment and definitely has nothing to do with the so called global economic crisis.

Kim Kardashian does not set interest rates, nor does she has anything to do with inflation or the high cost of living. 

She won't be the first nor last woman to marry for whatever reason she did. Some marry for money, security or convenience. Some marry to procreate (have kids) or for a better life be that a green card or residency or a new life. 

Please. Stop. With. How. Low. Kim. Went.  

Kim Kardashian just a hootie who has capitalised on her coochie (Ray J Sex Tape) and bootie. In fact her whole family has capitalised on her showing her coochie. In some respects and remove all the trapping of weath, money and celebrity has being pimped and sold by her family.

 If fact if it wasn’t for the fact she was ‘brand’ it is no body’s business. Everyone is acting so moralistic. High and mighty but marriages break up every day. I think what really gets people is Ms Kim Kardashian is making money from it. Let break this down –  booty girl may be making cash but she is by no means making as much as the people/companies behind her. The magazines, TV channels and websites make so much off direct advertising.

She is selling a product (her life story as she lives it) to a vast market who want it. They demand and she supplies.


However Ms Kim Kardashian  does offer a vital service. She offers total escapism. While we berate, criticise or love her she allows us to forget out troubles or bills for that instant. And in some respect she might every allow us to feel better than her.

The only issue for Ms Kim Kardashian is when her brand starts to fade or some new wannabe takes over. But that is the really down to the tastes of her market. And also another thing but this is real personal is about relationships. Her life is a living product for sale so can she get a ‘private real serious’ relationship – that will be the question because after a while it appears to be pretty empty.

Even now making the rounds about how ‘real’ the wedding and marriage was is really marketing her brand. There is a cynical sound of till/cash register ringing in the background her agent/manager charges for ‘exclusive’ interview to the highest bidders. Those who can’t secure the atteintion of Ms Kim Kardashian just print their own analysis on the whole drama. 

In the end it’s entertainment. Ms Kim Kardashian’s life is product which she markets as a brand. She is paid to live her life in front of cameras/media that however she has done nothing wrong. It’s just because you see it and think you can judge her. But really you can’t because she doesn’t  know you or care.

Did L'oreal land Cheryl Cole InStyle December's cover?

copywrite InStyle magazine

Well done,  Cheryl Cole.

Okay, I'm cynical but I was surprised when Ms Cheryl Cole landed the December cover of the UK InStyle. Of course she is pretty, thin, well styled but so are a lot. I was curious to find why in my cynicism that she could land a cover when she discussing projects technically means doing. She doesn't have anything really to promote at the time.

Yes, she was or is UK's sweet heart and for a long time the face of UK's X Factor. She was on every single cover of magazine from Vogue to Cosmo. Then came the Simon Cowell fall out over the US X Factor. After that it's being her living and she is still living off that fall out.

Anyway I digress and wonder why she should get the cover. It's an important one - but then magazine covers are planned months in advanced. It's a bit like an accounting budget and they probably didn't Ms Thing was going to throw a hissy fit. However more inportantly was at the intervew was a L'oreal offical.

Least I forget that Ms Cole is contracted to L'oreal or in friendly-speak is a 'spokesperson'. Not sure what Cheryl Cole can tell us about L'oreal that we don't already know when she isn't extactly a hairdresser. Anyway. It's about money. She represents their products. They have sunk ir invested wads of cash (should I say shareholder's wealth to be annoying) to use Ms Cole's image and it needs to pay dividends. Literally to thousands of screaming investors. InStyle is also a commerical venture reliant on advertising. L'oreal has a huge advertising budget to make it that powerful to secure covers for nearly 'has been' or 'irrelevant' celebrities - you have to protect your assets and investment. Times are lean so editors might just have to play ball and advertises can in some cases call the shots. Also Ms Cole is pretty so is isn't that bad. What gives this alleged Instyle-L'oreal-Cole game away. Well Cole is savy enough it mention hair. Something about the large hair or what not. But it's the footnote that gives it away. She is not promoting a movie, or new album but she is promoting and it's there in italics something to do with L'oreal.

Hey who knows the truth but well done Cheryl Cole.

InStyle magazines is now in the shops.

X Factor: The search for SyCo's new bitch. Frankie Cocozza is dumped!

Well, really! Poor lad, noe has been used and used by the X Factor machine and now he is no longer useful he had been dumped. I mean what has Frankie Cocozza done had wasn't really on the cards. The guy had no singing talent yet week after week he was left on and now dumped with a silly assed excuse of breaking the gold rule. Please. Please. Please. And to Frankie Cocozza - well fool you, boy. You were just an X-Factor bitch used the same way. He was probably subminally encouraged in some ways. Well hope it goes well for you now. The search of SyCo's new bytch is still on.

Psychologies Magazine: Dilemmas answered - My Mama Says I'm Too Fat to Get A Man

So Psychologies Magazine is my unjustified addictive purchase and I'm now going thorough it's problem's page. Now we have this babe who writes in whose own mother tells her she needs to lose weight because she is too chucky to get funky. Apparently, baby girls tells mama - it's because she has being moving and that's why she is single. Then she writes the agony auntie or in upmarket Psychologies Magazine pyschotherapist speak that her mama had hurt in a disrespectful way. Ya'll need to by the current issue to find out what Madam Pyschotherapist says.

Then baby girl goes on to say her mama is fat too and she refuses to see herself in a similar view. She cried real bad over her mama's comment. Says she ain't denying her size but refuse to beat herself over it. Yeah, right - lock the pies away.

First thing before we get into the whole self esteem issues.She didn't say how big she was. I guess it must be over a 'normal' big. Then fat is fat. Deal with it. Most guys and here is the key - most guys will date only up to a certain size then you have to compensate for your fatness. I don't get the whole 'disrespect' thing.

Sometimes in life I think you need to be objective. Not being fat anit going make you single but it is a valid view point. And plenty of people will think that too. Therefore take away blokes who think like her mama there are a few left.

Also people are hardly single because size. It is probaly more about attitude and how she 'images' her self.  And finally baby girl most men and I mean most men don't really care about size. If they fancy you, they fancy you. As I said it's more about your image and confidence rather than size.

http://www.psychologies.co.uk/

Psychologies Magazine: Why do I read it?

If there was magazine that I could not put down and had to buy it would this one. At the whooping price of £3.70 which is about $7.00.  I am truely addicted and to get out a subscription would be admitting defeat to the power it had over me. It's a very emotive magazine.

Why do I get it? Well at the magazine stand it seems to accurately solve all the problems in my life. I can relate to all the subjects and I think getting it will make me a better, more successful and happier person than I already am. This effect is quickly worn off when I take it home and dump in the corner of my living room.

I understoond this after a buying a couple of isses. Then I thought - well there must be something I could use to jusfity its purchase. Nothing, I still myself going to the checkout till with it firmly in my hand. Even when I newstand surf (reading all the magazines and indeed reading Psychologies Magazine cover to cover) I still feel I must buy it. It's not really for the celeb cover telling me how much they have suffered in their lives. This November issue it's Robin Wright. It's really for the little nuggets of advice that is scattered all over the magazine. A paragraph here and a paragraph there.

Some of the articles are good and others pure drivel. Well, maybe the drivel stuff does not apply to me. Even the editor Louse Chunn  in her November editor's letter says not everything is relevant to her life as she isn't every woman.

I also find that some but not all of the articles have a hidden agenda as in getting you to buy a book or something. They are appear as sophisticated press releases where authors come to flog or promote a book. Hardly an article without a footnote saying that some book or another will be available.



Anyway I've decided to see if I can disect why I buy this magazine. My justifcation this month was that I could use it to inspire my writing. Well I guess I've started.

Check it out http://www.psychologies.co.uk/